Skip to content
Lower risk Medical device recall · FDA · Published January 9, 2019

Karl Storz Endoscopy Insufflation Tubing Recall: High EO Residues Risk

Karl Storz recalls insufflation tubing with higher ethylene oxide residues than safe levels. Affected units include specific model/lot numbers. Consumers should check their tubing for the listed serial numbers.

🇺🇸 FDA recall #Z-1942-2020Medical deviceKarl Storz ›
Take action

Contact the company

Recalling firmKarl Storz Endoscopy2151 E Grand Ave · El Segundo, CA 90245-5017
✎ GovInfoNow plain-language explainer

What happened, in plain English

Karl Storz is recalling insufflation tubing used with their insufflator units because it may contain unsafe levels of ethylene oxide residues. This could pose a risk to health if the tubing is used in medical procedures. Read more at govinfonow.com/recall/69146-karl-storz-endoscopy-insufflation-tubing-recall-high-eo-residues-risk.

Source Summary by GovInfoNow · govinfonow.com/recall/69146-karl-storz-endoscopy-insufflation-tubing-recall-high-eo-residues-risk · Updated August 20, 2026 · FDA enforcement record: FDA #Z-1942-2020

Cite this page

“Karl Storz Endoscopy Insufflation Tubing Recall: High EO Residues Risk.” GovInfoNow, updated August 20, 2026. https://govinfonow.com/recall/69146-karl-storz-endoscopy-insufflation-tubing-recall-high-eo-residues-risk. Based on FDA recall #Z-1942-2020 (https://api.fda.gov/device/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22Z-1942-2020%22&limit=1).

Why it’s dangerous

The tubing may contain higher levels of ethylene oxide residues than acceptable limits. Ethylene oxide is a known carcinogen and can cause health issues if absorbed through skin contact or inhaled during medical procedures.

Who’s affected

Medical professionals and hospitals using the recalled tubing for endoscopy procedures. Patients undergoing procedures with this tubing may be at risk if the tubing is used without proper decontamination.

How to tell if you have this one

Check the model/lot numbers on the tubing: 031200-10/Lot W-027781, W-029058, W-028738; 031322-10/Lot W-027197, W-028171, W-027939, W-028207; 031532-10/Lot W-026437, W-027332, W-026871; 031622-10/Lot W-029555.

  • Brand
    Karl Storz
  • Category
    Medical device
Based on the official FDA remedy

What to do — step by step

  1. Check Tubing Model and Lot

    Look for the model/lot numbers listed in the recall notice to determine if your tubing is affected.

Where it went and when

Where it was distributed

Distributed in 27 states.

Alaska: not listedAKMaine: yesMEVermont: yesVTNew Hampshire: yesNHWashington: yesWAIdaho: not listedIDMontana: not listedMTNorth Dakota: not listedNDMinnesota: yesMNIllinois: yesILWisconsin: yesWIMichigan: yesMINew York: yesNYRhode Island: not listedRIMassachusetts: yesMAOregon: not listedORNevada: not listedNVWyoming: not listedWYSouth Dakota: not listedSDIowa: not listedIAIndiana: not listedINOhio: yesOHPennsylvania: yesPANew Jersey: yesNJConnecticut: yesCTCalifornia: yesCAUtah: not listedUTColorado: not listedCONebraska: yesNEMissouri: not listedMOKentucky: not listedKYWest Virginia: not listedWVVirginia: yesVAMaryland: yesMDDelaware: yesDEArizona: yesAZNew Mexico: not listedNMKansas: not listedKSArkansas: not listedARTennessee: not listedTNNorth Carolina: not listedNCSouth Carolina: yesSCDistrict of Columbia: not listedDCOklahoma: yesOKLouisiana: yesLAMississippi: not listedMSAlabama: yesALGeorgia: yesGAHawaii: not listedHITexas: yesTXFlorida: yesFL

FDA distribution: “57 consignees in the US. AL,AZ,CA,CT,DE,FL,GA,IL,LA,MA,MD,ME,MI,MN,NE,NH,NJ,NY,OH,OK,PA,SC,TX,VA,VT,WA and WI” States read from FDA’s own wording; “not listed” means the notice does not name it.

States: Alabama, Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin.

Recall timeline

FDA terminated this recall 3.7 years after the firm started it.

1. Firm started the recall: Jan 9, 201912. FDA classified it Class III: May 8, 202023. Published in FDA’s Enforcement Report: May 20, 202034. FDA terminated the recall: Sep 28, 2022420192022
  1. Firm started the recall
  2. FDA classified it Class III
  3. Published in FDA’s Enforcement Report
  4. FDA terminated the recall

Dates from the agency record only; steps without a date are left out.

Similar recalls

Latest medical device recalls

Keep exploring

Where this comes from

The facts (hazard, remedy, dates, manufacturer) are pulled from the official FDA recall record. The plain-language summary and step-by-step checklist are written by GovInfoNow to make the official notice easier to act on — they don’t replace it.

  • Official source: FDA Recall #Z-1942-2020 (January 9, 2019) — FDA publishes no per-recall page; this is the official machine-readable enforcement record. Search FDA recalls for Z-1942-2020 to see it in context.
  • Plain-language summary written by qwen3:4b on August 20, 2026, from the official record above. Not reviewed by a person — if it conflicts with the FDA notice, the notice is correct. Report an error on this page.
  • GovInfoNow is an independent service and is not a government agency. We republish official FDA recall data; we don’t issue, amend or administer recalls.
GovInfoNow is an independent guide. We are not FDA or any government agency. Always confirm details with the official recall.Data: CPSC · FDA · NHTSA · USDA