Skip to content
Lower risk Medical device recall · FDA · Published January 14, 2019

BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel Recall: False Negative Results for ETEC and Plesiomonas

Becton Dickinson recalls BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel (Catalog 442963) due to false negative results when testing for ETEC and Plesiomonas shigelloides. Affected units may not detect infections accurately.

🇺🇸 FDA recall #Z-0981-2019Medical deviceBecton Dickinson ›
Take action

Contact the company

Recalling firmBecton Dickinson & Co.7 Loveton Cir · Sparks, MD 21152-9212
✎ GovInfoNow plain-language explainer

What happened, in plain English

Becton Dickinson is recalling its BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel (Catalog Number 4:42963) because it can give false negative results when testing for specific bacteria like ETEC and Plesiomonas shigelloides. This means the test might miss infections, leading to incorrect health conclusions. Read more at govinfonow.com/recall/69124-bd-max-enteric-bacterial-panel-recall-false-negative-results-for.

Source Summary by GovInfoNow · govinfonow.com/recall/69124-bd-max-enteric-bacterial-panel-recall-false-negative-results-for · Updated August 20, 2026 · FDA enforcement record: FDA #Z-0981-2019

Cite this page

“BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel Recall: False Negative Results for ETEC and Plesiomonas.” GovInfoNow, updated August 20, 2026. https://govinfonow.com/recall/69124-bd-max-enteric-bacterial-panel-recall-false-negative-results-for. Based on FDA recall #Z-0981-2019 (https://api.fda.gov/device/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22Z-0981-2019%22&limit=1).

Why it’s dangerous

The panel can produce false negative results when testing for Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and Plesiomonas shigelloides. This means infections might go undetected, potentially leading to incorrect health decisions.

Who’s affected

Healthcare professionals using the BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel for in vitro diagnostic testing are most at risk. The recall affects specific lot numbers and expiration dates.

How to tell if you have this one

Check for the catalog number 442963 on the BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel. Affected units have specific lot numbers: 8194784 and 8199682, with an expiration date of February 22, 2020.

  • Brand
    Becton Dickinson
  • Product
    BD MAX Enteric Bacterial Panel -For In Vitro Diagnostic Use with the BD MAX System Catalog Number: 442963 The BD MAX
  • Category
    Medical device
Based on the official FDA remedy

What to do — step by step

  1. Check Panel Lot Number

    Look for lot numbers 8194784 or 8199682 on the panel's label.

Where it went and when

Where it was distributed

Distributed nationwide and abroad; the notice names 17 states.

Alaska: nationwideAKMaine: nationwideMEVermont: named in the noticeVTNew Hampshire: nationwideNHWashington: named in the noticeWAIdaho: named in the noticeIDMontana: named in the noticeMTNorth Dakota: nationwideNDMinnesota: named in the noticeMNIllinois: nationwideILWisconsin: nationwideWIMichigan: named in the noticeMINew York: nationwideNYRhode Island: nationwideRIMassachusetts: nationwideMAOregon: named in the noticeORNevada: nationwideNVWyoming: nationwideWYSouth Dakota: nationwideSDIowa: nationwideIAIndiana: nationwideINOhio: named in the noticeOHPennsylvania: named in the noticePANew Jersey: named in the noticeNJConnecticut: nationwideCTCalifornia: named in the noticeCAUtah: nationwideUTColorado: nationwideCONebraska: nationwideNEMissouri: nationwideMOKentucky: nationwideKYWest Virginia: nationwideWVVirginia: named in the noticeVAMaryland: nationwideMDDelaware: nationwideDEArizona: nationwideAZNew Mexico: named in the noticeNMKansas: nationwideKSArkansas: nationwideARTennessee: nationwideTNNorth Carolina: nationwideNCSouth Carolina: named in the noticeSCDistrict of Columbia: nationwideDCOklahoma: nationwideOKLouisiana: nationwideLAMississippi: nationwideMSAlabama: nationwideALGeorgia: named in the noticeGAHawaii: named in the noticeHITexas: named in the noticeTXFlorida: nationwideFL

FDA distribution: “Worldwide Distribution: US (nationwide) to states of:CA, GA, HI, ID, MI, MN, MT, NJ, NM, OH, OR, PA, SC, TX, VA, VT, WA ; and to countries of: Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Europe, and Korea.” States read from FDA’s own wording; “not listed” means the notice does not name it.

Named in the notice: California, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington.

Recall timeline

FDA terminated this recall 15 months after the firm started it.

1. Firm started the recall: Jan 14, 201912. FDA classified it Class II: Mar 6, 201923. Published in FDA’s Enforcement Report: Mar 13, 201934. FDA terminated the recall: Apr 3, 2020420192020
  1. Firm started the recall
  2. FDA classified it Class II
  3. Published in FDA’s Enforcement Report
  4. FDA terminated the recall

Dates from the agency record only; steps without a date are left out.

Similar recalls

Latest medical device recalls

Keep exploring

Where this comes from

The facts (hazard, remedy, dates, manufacturer) are pulled from the official FDA recall record. The plain-language summary and step-by-step checklist are written by GovInfoNow to make the official notice easier to act on — they don’t replace it.

  • Official source: FDA Recall #Z-0981-2019 (January 14, 2019) — FDA publishes no per-recall page; this is the official machine-readable enforcement record. Search FDA recalls for Z-0981-2019 to see it in context.
  • Plain-language summary written by qwen3:4b on August 20, 2026, from the official record above. Not reviewed by a person — if it conflicts with the FDA notice, the notice is correct. Report an error on this page.
  • GovInfoNow is an independent service and is not a government agency. We republish official FDA recall data; we don’t issue, amend or administer recalls.
GovInfoNow is an independent guide. We are not FDA or any government agency. Always confirm details with the official recall.Data: CPSC · FDA · NHTSA · USDA