Skip to content
Lower risk Medical device recall · FDA · Published March 5, 2021

Boston Scientific MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheter Recall: Incorrect Labeling and Packaging

Boston Scientific recalls certain batches of MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheters due to incorrect labeling and packaging. Affected units have specific batch numbers and expiration dates. Consumers should check their product details to determine if they are affected.

🇺🇸 FDA recall #Z-1429-2021Medical deviceBoston Scientific ›
Take action

Contact the company

Recalling firmBoston Scientific Corporation1 Scimed Pl · Maple Grove, MN 55311-1565
✎ GovInfoNow plain-language explainer

What happened, in plain English

Boston Scientific is recalling specific batches of MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheters because they were incorrectly labeled and packaged. This issue does not pose a safety risk but requires correction to ensure proper use and documentation. Read more at govinfonow.com/recall/63139-boston-scientific-mamba-flex-135-microcatheter-recall-incorrect-labeling-and.

Source Summary by GovInfoNow · govinfonow.com/recall/63139-boston-scientific-mamba-flex-135-microcatheter-recall-incorrect-labeling-and · Updated August 19, 2026 · FDA enforcement record: FDA #Z-1429-2021

Cite this page

“Boston Scientific MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheter Recall: Incorrect Labeling and Packaging.” GovInfoNow, updated August 19, 2026. https://govinfonow.com/recall/63139-boston-scientific-mamba-flex-135-microcatheter-recall-incorrect-labeling-and. Based on FDA recall #Z-1429-2021 (https://api.fda.gov/device/enforcement.json?search=recall_number:%22Z-1429-2021%22&limit=1).

Why it’s dangerous

The microcatheters were packaged with incorrect labels and a missing closure strip, which could lead to confusion during medical procedures. However, this does not cause immediate harm or injury.

Who’s affected

Healthcare professionals who use these microcatheters in medical procedures may be affected. Patients using these devices are not directly impacted by the labeling issue.

How to tell if you have this one

Check for batch numbers 26578463 or 26578470 on the carton. The product was sold with an expiration date of January 4, 2023, and is labeled with a green color code.

  • Brand
    Boston Scientific
  • Product
    MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheter. Packaged with protective sleeve over catheter, sealed in a Tyvek pouch, and is then
  • Category
    Medical device
FDA recall event · 2 products

All 2 products in this recall

FDA lists each product line separately under one recall event. Check your product description, lot or code numbers against each row. Every row shares the hazard and remedy on this page.

  • Classification
    Class II
  • Status
    Terminated
  • Distribution
    Distributed nationwide to AL, AR, AZ, CO, FL, GA, IA, IL, KY, LA, MI, MN, MO, MS, NC, ND, NV, NY, OK, OH, PR, SC, TN, VA, WA, WI and internationally to Belgium, France, Great Britain, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto Rico, Switzerland
Recall numberProduct, codes & lotsQuantity
Z-1429-2021MAMBA Flex 135 Microcatheter. Packaged with protective sleeve over catheter, sealed in a Tyvek pouch, and is then labeled and placed in carton with IFU. A closure strip, top and side labels are applied to the carton.; UPN: H7493928713540 US (Green); Batches: 26578463 and 26578470; GTIN: 8714729940289; and Expiration Date: 4-Jan-2352 devices
Z-1430-2021MAMBA Microcatheter. Packaged with protective sleeve over catheter, sealed in a Tyvek pouch, and is then labeled and placed in carton with IFU. A closure strip, top and side labels are applied to the carton.; MAMBA 135 CM US microcatheter: UPN: H7493928713500; Batch: 26578155; GTIN: 8714729940241; and Expiration Date: 4-Jan-23 MAMBA 135 CM OUS microcatheter: UPN: H7493928713520; Batch: 26578465; GTIN: 8714729940265; and Expiration Date: 4-Jan-2363 devices
Based on the official FDA remedy

What to do — step by step

  1. Check Product Details

    Identify the batch number on the carton to determine if your microcatheter is affected.

Where it went and when

Where it was distributed

Distributed nationwide and abroad; the notice names 25 states.

Alaska: nationwideAKMaine: nationwideMEVermont: nationwideVTNew Hampshire: nationwideNHWashington: named in the noticeWAIdaho: nationwideIDMontana: nationwideMTNorth Dakota: named in the noticeNDMinnesota: named in the noticeMNIllinois: named in the noticeILWisconsin: named in the noticeWIMichigan: named in the noticeMINew York: named in the noticeNYRhode Island: nationwideRIMassachusetts: nationwideMAOregon: nationwideORNevada: named in the noticeNVWyoming: nationwideWYSouth Dakota: nationwideSDIowa: named in the noticeIAIndiana: nationwideINOhio: named in the noticeOHPennsylvania: nationwidePANew Jersey: nationwideNJConnecticut: nationwideCTCalifornia: nationwideCAUtah: nationwideUTColorado: named in the noticeCONebraska: nationwideNEMissouri: named in the noticeMOKentucky: named in the noticeKYWest Virginia: nationwideWVVirginia: named in the noticeVAMaryland: nationwideMDDelaware: nationwideDEArizona: named in the noticeAZNew Mexico: nationwideNMKansas: nationwideKSArkansas: named in the noticeARTennessee: named in the noticeTNNorth Carolina: named in the noticeNCSouth Carolina: named in the noticeSCDistrict of Columbia: nationwideDCOklahoma: named in the noticeOKLouisiana: named in the noticeLAMississippi: named in the noticeMSAlabama: named in the noticeALGeorgia: named in the noticeGAHawaii: nationwideHITexas: nationwideTXFlorida: named in the noticeFLPuerto Rico: named in the noticePR

FDA distribution: “Distributed nationwide to AL, AR, AZ, CO, FL, GA, IA, IL, KY, LA, MI, MN, MO, MS, NC, ND, NV, NY, OK, OH, PR, SC, TN, VA, WA, WI and internationally to Belgium, France, Great Britain, Israel, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Puerto…” States read from FDA’s own wording; “not listed” means the notice does not name it.

Named in the notice: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nevada, New York, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin.

Recall timeline

FDA terminated this recall 22 months after the firm started it.

1. Firm started the recall: Mar 5, 202112. FDA classified it Class II: Apr 15, 202123. Published in FDA’s Enforcement Report: Apr 21, 202134. FDA terminated the recall: Jan 5, 2023420212023
  1. Firm started the recall
  2. FDA classified it Class II
  3. Published in FDA’s Enforcement Report
  4. FDA terminated the recall

Dates from the agency record only; steps without a date are left out.

Similar recalls

Latest medical device recalls

Keep exploring

Where this comes from

The facts (hazard, remedy, dates, manufacturer) are pulled from the official FDA recall record. The plain-language summary and step-by-step checklist are written by GovInfoNow to make the official notice easier to act on — they don’t replace it.

  • Official source: FDA Recall #Z-1429-2021 (March 5, 2021) — FDA publishes no per-recall page; this is the official machine-readable enforcement record. Search FDA recalls for Z-1429-2021 to see it in context.
  • Plain-language summary written by qwen3:4b on August 19, 2026, from the official record above. Not reviewed by a person — if it conflicts with the FDA notice, the notice is correct. Report an error on this page.
  • GovInfoNow is an independent service and is not a government agency. We republish official FDA recall data; we don’t issue, amend or administer recalls.
GovInfoNow is an independent guide. We are not FDA or any government agency. Always confirm details with the official recall.Data: CPSC · FDA · NHTSA · USDA