Daavlin recalls Photera 600 phototherapy devices with incorrect UV sensor calibration that may deliver unsafe UV levels for skin treatment.
Calibrated Output was not calculating correctly - UV Sensor GAIN being applied was incorrect - GAIN seemed to be "4/5" instead of "7" (counts were at ~1000 instead of ~5000).
Daavlin is recalling Photera 600 phototherapy devices because their UV sensors were miscalibrated, potentially delivering unsafe UV doses. This could cause skin damage during dermatological treatments if used without correction.
The UV sensor in the device was incorrectly calibrated, showing a gain value of "4/5" instead of "7". This means the device delivered about 1000 UV counts instead of the required 5000 counts, potentially causing insufficient treatment or unsafe exposure levels.
Users of the Photera 600 phototherapy device for skin conditions are affected. Those using the device for medical treatments are most at risk of skin damage from incorrect UV exposure.
Check for serial numbers starting with 6-09022NB4CL through 6-09539NB4CL on the Photera 600 device. These specific serial numbers were identified in the recall.
Look for the serial number on the device to confirm if it matches the listed numbers: 6-09022NB4CL through 6-09539NB4CL.
The UV sensor was miscalibrated, showing a gain value of "4/5" instead of "7". This could result in delivering unsafe UV levels during skin treatments.
Check the device serial number against the list provided. If it matches, stop using it and contact Daavlin for further instructions.
The recall record does not specify a remedy or fix for this issue.
We’ve drafted a message you can send Daavlin to request your refund or repair — edit it as you like.
Subject: Recall Z-2743-2026 — Daavlin Daavlin Hello, I own a Daavlin that is covered by recall Z-2743-2026 from Daavlin. I’m writing to arrange the remedy described in the recall (a refund, repair, or replacement as applicable). Could you please tell me the next steps to resolve this? Thank you.
Experiences, tips, and questions from readers. Every comment is reviewed before it appears.
No comments yet — be the first to share your experience.
The facts (hazard, remedy, dates, manufacturer) are pulled from the official FDA recall record. The plain-language summary and step-by-step checklist are written by GovInfoNow to make the official notice easier to act on — they don’t replace it.
