Skip to content
Food recall · FDA · Published August 17, 2026

Best Friends Bakery, LLC recalls PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE NET WT 3.5 oz. INGREDIENTS: WHOLE GRAIN OATS, MILK, MARGARINE***WATER, SALT, CONTAINS LESS

Best Friends Bakery recalls pumpkin spice no-bake cookies due to missing peanuts and eggs in ingredient lists. This could cause allergic reactions for those with peanut or egg allergies.

🇺🇸 FDA recall #H-1386-2026FoodBest Friends Bakery ›
✎ GovInfoNow plain-language explainer

Best Friends Bakery is recalling pumpkin spice no-bake cookies because the product lists peanuts and eggs in the ingredient statement but omits them from the 'contains' statement. This could cause allergic reactions for people with peanut or egg allergies. Read more at govinfonow.com/recall/1124600-best-friends-bakery-pumpkin-spice-no-bake-cookie-recall-peanuts.

Source Summary by GovInfoNow · govinfonow.com/recall/1124600-best-friends-bakery-pumpkin-spice-no-bake-cookie-recall-peanuts · Published September 29, 2026 · Updated October 4, 2026 · Official notice: FDA #H-1386-2026

Cite this page

“Best Friends Bakery Pumpkin Spice No Bake Cookie Recall: Peanuts and Eggs Hazard.” GovInfoNow, updated October 4, 2026. https://govinfonow.com/recall/1124600-best-friends-bakery-pumpkin-spice-no-bake-cookie-recall-peanuts. Based on FDA recall #H-1386-2026.

What was recalled

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a Class II recall for a specific batch of baked goods produced by Best Friends Bakery, LLC. This action involves the brand’s Pumpkin Spice No Bake Cookies, which are packaged in 3.5-ounce net weight containers. The product was distributed across multiple states, including Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. The recall was initiated on August 17, 2026, following the discovery of significant labeling errors that pose a serious risk to consumers with food allergies.

The specific item subject to this recall is identified by its unique product code and lot number. You can identify the affected cookies by looking for the UPC code 8 10158 14087 5 on the packaging. The batch in question is Lot 20326. The product description on the label reads "PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE NET WT 3.5 oz." and lists the ingredients as whole grain oats, milk, margarine (which includes water), salt, soy lecithin, vegetable mono & diglycerides, potassium sorbate, citric acid, natural & artificial flavor, beta carotene, vitamin A palmitate added, peanut butter, vanilla, pumpkin pie spice, glycerine, and paprika oleoresin. The label also states that the product contains less than 2% of certain ingredients.

The manufacturer, Best Friends Bakery, LLC, is located at Michelle's Bakery, 101 Fashion Ave, Connelly Springs, NC 28612. Although the product was distributed in several states, the facility responsible for its production is in North Carolina. The recall affects only the specific lot mentioned above; other lots or products from Best Friends Bakery are not included in this notice unless explicitly stated by the FDA. Consumers should carefully check their pantry items against the UPC and lot number to determine if they possess a recalled product.

This recall highlights the importance of accurate ingredient labeling, especially for products that may contain common allergens. The discrepancy between the listed ingredients and the "contains" statement is the primary reason for this action. Consumers who have purchased these cookies should verify the lot number and UPC code to ensure they are not part of the recalled batch. If you have questions about the recall or need further information, it is recommended to contact Best Friends Bakery, LLC directly using the contact information provided by the manufacturer.

The hazard, explained

At first glance, this recall might seem like a simple clerical error—a typo on a label rather than a dangerous product. However, in the world of food safety, labeling accuracy is not just about transparency; it is a critical line of defense for people with severe allergies. The core issue here involves two distinct but equally serious misrepresentations regarding allergens: peanuts and eggs. Specifically, Best Friends Bakery listed peanuts in the ingredient list within the text description but failed to include them in the mandatory "Contains" statement at the bottom. Simultaneously, they incorrectly claimed the product contains eggs in that same summary statement, even though no eggs are actually present in the formulation. This double error creates a confusing and potentially life-threatening situation for consumers who rely on those labels to make safe dietary choices.

The danger regarding peanuts is particularly acute because peanut allergies are among the most common and severe food allergies. For individuals with IgE-mediated peanut allergy, even trace amounts of peanut protein can trigger a reaction known as anaphylaxis. This is not merely an inconvenience or a mild rash; it is a systemic, rapid-onset medical emergency. When someone with this allergy consumes peanuts, their immune system mistakenly identifies the proteins as harmful invaders. The body releases a flood of chemicals, including histamine, which causes blood pressure to drop sharply and the airways to narrow. Without immediate treatment using an epinephrine auto-injector and emergency medical care, anaphylaxis can lead to unconsciousness, respiratory failure, and even death within minutes. Because peanuts are often processed in facilities alongside other ingredients, cross-contact is a real risk, which is why the "Contains" statement is so vital—it tells you if the manufacturer has taken steps to prevent that contamination.

The error concerning eggs adds another layer of complexity. While egg allergies are also serious and can cause anaphylaxis, the impact here is different. For those who avoid eggs due to allergy, this label gives them false confidence that they are safe from eggs when they are actually not exposed to them in this specific product. However, for those with a peanut allergy, the omission of peanuts from the "Contains" line is the primary threat. They might read the label, see no mention of peanuts in the summary, and assume the product is safe, unaware that the ingredient list contradicts the summary. This discrepancy can lead to accidental ingestion. Furthermore, the recall notes that the product was made in a facility with peanuts and tree nuts, which means there is a legitimate risk of cross-contact regardless of whether peanuts are an intentional ingredient. The label’s failure to clearly warn about this potential presence leaves consumers without the necessary information to protect their health.

Understanding how food allergies work helps clarify why these labeling mistakes are taken so seriously by the FDA. Allergens are proteins that the body perceives as threats. In many cases, cooking or baking does not destroy these proteins; they remain stable and active even after heat treatment. This means that whether an allergen is present in its raw form or processed into a powder or paste, it can still trigger a reaction. The "Contains" statement is designed to be the quick-reference guide for people who scan labels for safety. When that guide is inconsistent with the detailed ingredient list, it breaks the trust between the manufacturer and the consumer. In this case, the confusion stems from both an omission (peanuts) and a commission (eggs), creating a scenario where no one can be entirely sure of the product’s true allergen profile without deep scrutiny, which is often not feasible in a moment of panic or hunger.

The physical mechanism of harm remains the same regardless of the labeling error: if you are allergic to peanuts and consume this cookie, your body will react as if you have eaten pure peanut butter. The severity depends on the amount ingested and your individual sensitivity level. For some, a tiny crumb can be enough; for others, it might take a larger serving. But the unpredictability of allergic reactions is what makes accurate labeling so important. There is no way to know in advance how severe a reaction will be from one exposure to the next. Therefore, the hazard here is not just the presence of an allergen, but the deception of the label that prevents you from avoiding it. This is why the FDA classifies this as a Class II recall, indicating that use of or exposure to the product may cause temporary or medically serious adverse health consequences, though it is unlikely to cause serious injury or death in most cases—but the risk is never zero for those with severe allergies.

Who is most at risk

When we talk about food recalls, the phrase "at risk" often brings to mind a narrow group of people. In reality, anyone who eats this product faces a problem, but the severity of that problem varies dramatically depending on an individual’s immune system and their specific biological reactions to allergens. The recall issued by Best Friends Bakery for their Pumpkin Spice No Bake Cookies involves two major allergens: peanuts and eggs. However, the danger here is not just the presence of these ingredients, but the confusion caused by labeling errors. Because the packaging lists peanuts in the ingredient statement but omits them from the "Contains" statement, and lists eggs in the "Contains" statement while they are absent from the product, this creates a dual threat for two very different groups of consumers.

The individuals at the highest risk are those with diagnosed peanut allergies. For these consumers, even trace amounts of peanut protein can trigger anaphylaxis, a severe and potentially life-threatening allergic reaction that causes airways to close and blood pressure to drop. The specific labeling error here is particularly dangerous because it violates the trust established by the FDA’s Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act. A person with a peanut allergy relies on the "Contains" statement as their primary safety check. Seeing that peanuts are not listed there, they may confidently consume the cookie, unaware that the ingredient list (which they might skim over) actually includes peanut butter. This oversight can lead to accidental exposure, turning a routine snack into a medical emergency.

A second group at significant risk includes individuals with egg allergies. While eggs are less commonly associated with severe anaphylaxis compared to peanuts, they are still a top eight allergen. The labeling error here works in reverse: the package claims to contain eggs, which might deter someone with an egg allergy from buying the product initially. However, if that person has outgrown their egg allergy or is unsure of its severity, they might proceed anyway, only to find the product is actually safe but misleadingly labeled. Conversely, for those who are highly sensitive or have co-existing allergies, the confusion itself poses a risk. If a consumer with multiple food sensitivities attempts to navigate the conflicting information on the label, they may make a hasty decision based on incomplete data, potentially ingesting an ingredient they intended to avoid.

Additionally, we must consider vulnerable populations such as young children and the elderly. Children often have developing immune systems and may be more prone to severe reactions to allergens than adults. Parents who rely on quick label checks to manage their child’s diet are especially susceptible to this error because they may not read every single line of the ingredient list, relying instead on the summary "Contains" box for speed and accuracy. Similarly, older adults may have weakened immune systems or other health conditions that make any unexpected dietary indiscretion more dangerous. For these groups, the clarity of food labeling is not just a matter of preference; it is a critical component of their daily health management. The distribution of this product across ten states means that families in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia are all part of this potential exposure zone, making accurate identification crucial for caregivers and individuals alike.

How to tell if you have the recalled item

If you are trying to determine whether the sweet treat in your pantry matches this specific FDA recall, you need to look closely at both the product’s name and its packaging details. The item involved is a packaged snack called PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE. It is important to note that this is not a homemade or generic bakery item sold in bulk bins; it is a commercially produced, individually wrapped good. The net weight of the package is clearly marked as 3.5 oz., which is a standard single-serving size. If your cookies are larger, smaller, or labeled simply as “pumpkin cookies” without the specific “No Bake” designation, they are likely not part of this recall.

The most critical step in identification is examining the ingredient and allergen statement on the label. This particular recall involves a confusing labeling error where peanuts were omitted from the “Contains” statement despite being listed in the ingredients, and eggs were incorrectly listed in the “Contains” statement despite not being in the product. Therefore, you should look for a package that lists WHOLE GRAIN OATS, MILK, MARGARINE, WATER, and SALT as the primary ingredients. The label will also indicate that the product contains less than 2% of various additives, including soy lecithin, vegetable mono & diglycerides, potassium sorbate, citric acid, natural & artificial flavor, beta carotene, vitamin A palmitate, peanut butter***vanilla***pumpkin pie spice***glycerine, and paprika oleoresin. Crucially, the “Contains” statement on this specific package will incorrectly list EGG, MILK, SOY, and WHEAT. If your package does not show this exact, potentially confusing allergen declaration, it is not the recalled item.

Next, check the manufacturer information. The product was produced by Best Friends Bakery, LLC, but you may also see a reference to Michelle's Bakery on the packaging. The address listed is 101 Fashion Ave, Connelly Springs, NC 28612. This specific distribution pattern helps narrow down the potential scope of the issue, as the product was shipped to consumers in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia. If you purchased the item outside of these states, it is less likely to be affected, though not impossible.

Finally, and most importantly, you must verify the lot code. The recall applies specifically to the product with Lot 20326. Additionally, check for the Universal Product Code (UPC), which should read 8 10158 14087 5. These codes are typically printed on the back or side of the package near the expiration date or nutritional information. Without matching this exact lot number and UPC, your pumpkin spice cookies are safe to eat. If you have a package with these specific identifiers but are unsure about its safety due to the allergen discrepancy, it is best to err on the side of caution.

What to do — step by step

If you have purchased the Best Friends Bakery Pumpkin Spice No Bake Cookies from your local store, your immediate priority should be ensuring that no one in your household consumes them. Because this recall involves a critical labeling error regarding major allergens—specifically peanuts and eggs—the safest course of action is to treat every package as potentially unsafe for those with allergies. Please do not taste the product to check its contents; even a small crumb can trigger a severe reaction in sensitive individuals. The most prudent first step is to physically separate the recalled cookies from your pantry or refrigerator, keeping them away from other foods to prevent any accidental cross-contamination or confusion during cleanup.

Once you have secured the product, it is important to understand that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not listed a specific remedy for this particular recall in their official announcement. This means there are no detailed instructions provided by the manufacturer regarding returns, refunds, or repairs at this time. While this might feel frustrating if you are looking for a clear path to compensation, it is crucial not to assume that the product is safe to keep or consume simply because a return process hasn't been outlined. The absence of a stated remedy does not negate the health risk; it simply means the company has not yet communicated their resolution plan to the public.

In the meantime, you should contact Best Friends Bakery directly for further information. Although specific contact details were not included in the provided recall facts, you can likely find customer service information on the product packaging or by searching for "Michelle's Bakery" located at 101 Fashion Ave, Connelly Springs, NC 28612. Reach out to them to ask if they are processing refunds or if they have issued a statement regarding the return of these specific lots. Keep your receipt and the product packaging handy, as you will likely need to provide the lot number (Lot 20326) and the UPC code (8 10158 14087 5) when speaking with them.

If Best Friends Bakery does not respond or if you are unable to get a clear answer, consider reporting your experience to the FDA’s Safety Reporting Portal. This helps regulators track the scope of the issue and may prompt faster action from the company. For now, dispose of the cookies in a sealed bag to prevent others from accidentally consuming them, or donate them to a food bank only if you are absolutely certain no one with allergies will eat them—though disposal is generally the safer choice given the severity of potential allergic reactions.

Your refund, repair, or replacement options

When you encounter a product recall, the immediate question on your mind is often, "What do I do with this item, and will I get my money back?" In the case of the Best Friends Bakery PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE recall, it is important to approach the remedy section with clarity and realistic expectations. The official FDA recall data provided for this specific incident does not explicitly state a standard remedy such as a direct refund, repair service, or automatic replacement. This absence of specified remedial terms in the official record means that you should not assume a standardized corporate payout process is automatically in place. Instead, your options depend entirely on where and how you purchased the product.

First, it is crucial to understand why there is no "repair" option here. Unlike a defective appliance or a piece of machinery, food items cannot be repaired. The only logical remedy for a consumer who has purchased this product is a financial refund. However, because the recall notice does not list a specific contact number, website, or mailing address for Best Friends Bakery, LLC to process these refunds directly, you must look to the point of sale. If you bought the cookies from a large grocery chain, a convenience store, or an online retailer, your first step should be to return the product to that specific vendor. Most reputable retailers have their own internal policies for handling recalled items, which often include full refunds at the register or via credit card reversal if you no longer have the receipt.

If you purchased the item directly from Best Friends Bakery, LLC or through a smaller, independent distributor, the process may require more proactive communication. Since the recall facts do not provide a dedicated recall hotline or email address for consumers, you should contact the customer service department of the store where you made the purchase. Explain that you have a product subject to an FDA Class II recall due to undeclared allergens (peanuts and eggs). Store managers are typically well-versed in handling these situations and can often issue a refund without requiring you to navigate complex corporate recall procedures. If the retailer is unhelpful, you might try to locate general contact information for Best Friends Bakery through their official website or business listings, but be aware that the recall document itself does not guarantee they have set up a specific claims process.

It is also worth noting that in many food recalls, especially those involving Class II hazards like undeclared allergens, companies may focus primarily on removing the product from shelves rather than processing individual refunds. This does not mean you are out of luck, but it does mean you must act as your own advocate. Keep your receipt if possible, as it will be essential for proving your purchase to either the retailer or the manufacturer. If you cannot find a refund through the store, and no manufacturer contact is listed in the official data, you may choose to simply discard the product safely. While this feels unsatisfactory, the primary goal of the recall is safety, not financial restitution. The lack of a stated remedy in the official record suggests that the company may be relying on retailers to handle consumer inquiries, or they may have provided separate contact details in other press releases not included in this specific data set.

In summary, your best path forward is to treat this as a standard return for a defective or hazardous good. Contact the retailer where you bought the cookies and request a refund based on the safety recall. Do not attempt to send money or products to an unverified address found online, as the official record does not provide one. If the retailer refuses to help, your remaining option is to dispose of the product safely to protect your health, recognizing that the financial loss may fall on you due to the absence of a clearly defined manufacturer-led refund process in the available facts.

What can happen if you ignore it

When a food recall involves undeclared allergens or mislabeled ingredients, the stakes are rarely about minor inconvenience—they are about physiological safety. In this specific case involving Best Friends Bakery’s Pumpkin Spice No Bake Cookies, the core danger stems from a confusing and contradictory labeling error regarding two of the most common and potentially severe food allergens: peanuts and eggs. While the product contains milk, soy, wheat, and oats, the critical discrepancies lie in how peanuts and eggs are represented on the package versus what is actually inside.

If you continue to consume these cookies despite knowing about the recall, you risk exposing yourself or others to unintended allergens. The recall notice highlights that while peanuts are listed in the ingredient statement (specifically as peanut butter), they were omitted from the "Contains" statement. This omission creates a dangerous blind spot for anyone relying on that summary line for quick safety checks. More alarmingly, the label explicitly states "CONTAINS: EGG," yet the product formulation does not actually include eggs. For someone with a severe egg allergy who scans the label and sees this declaration, they might avoid the product entirely, missing out on a food item they could safely eat. However, for someone with a peanut allergy, the situation is far more perilous. The presence of peanuts in the ingredients suggests cross-contact or intentional inclusion, but the lack of proper allergen signaling can lead to complacency. If you have a peanut allergy and assume the product is safe because it does not prominently scream "PEANUT" in the main warning box, you could inadvertently ingest a potent allergen.

The physical consequences of ingesting an undeclared or mislabeled allergen can range from mild discomfort to life-threatening emergency situations. For individuals with IgE-mediated food allergies, even trace amounts of peanuts can trigger anaphylaxis, a rapid-onset reaction that constricts airways, causes swelling in the throat, and leads to a dangerous drop in blood pressure. This requires immediate administration of epinephrine and emergency medical attention. Similarly, while egg allergies are often outgrown, severe reactions can still occur, causing hives, gastrointestinal distress, respiratory issues, or anaphylaxis. The confusion here is compounded by the fact that the product was made in a facility with peanuts and tree nuts, meaning there is a high risk of cross-contamination even if peanuts were not a primary ingredient. Ignoring this recall means ignoring the possibility that your body’s immune system may react violently to proteins it has been taught to fear.

Beyond the immediate health risks, continuing to eat recalled products can also lead to significant secondary consequences. If you experience an allergic reaction and require hospitalization, the financial burden of emergency care can be substantial. Furthermore, if you are unaware that the product was part of a recall at the time of consumption, you may not realize the source of your illness, delaying proper medical diagnosis and treatment. For families with children, who often have stricter dietary restrictions due to allergies or intolerances, this kind of labeling error is particularly dangerous because caregivers rely on clear labels to make split-second decisions about what is safe to serve. By ignoring the recall, you are essentially gambling with your health and the health of anyone else in your household who might eat the remaining cookies. The confusion between "contains" statements that are factually incorrect (listing eggs when none are present) and those that are incomplete (omitting peanuts from the summary) undermines the very trust consumers place in regulatory labeling. Do not take that gamble. The potential cost of ignoring this warning is simply too high.

Staying safe: broader tips

When it comes to food safety, especially regarding allergens like peanuts and eggs, the most effective defense is a combination of vigilant label reading and open communication. Even with rigorous manufacturing processes, cross-contact can occur in shared facilities, as seen in this recall where items were made in a plant that also handles tree nuts and peanuts. The best way to protect yourself and your loved ones is to make reading ingredient lists and allergen statements a non-negotiable part of your shopping routine. Never assume a product is safe based on its flavor or appearance alone; always check the "Contains" statement for major allergens and review the ingredients list for hidden sources. If you have severe allergies, look for phrases like "Made in a facility with..." or "May contain traces of..." as these indicate potential cross-contact risks that go beyond the intentional ingredients.

Building a habit of checking for recalls is another crucial layer of protection. Product safety issues can arise at any time due to manufacturing errors, supply chain changes, or new health information. You can stay informed by subscribing to email alerts from the FDA and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which send direct notifications about active recalls. Additionally, following reputable food safety news sources or social media accounts dedicated to consumer protection can help you catch issues quickly. If you regularly purchase products from smaller bakeries or local brands like Best Friends Bakery, consider visiting their websites directly for updates, as they may announce recalls before they appear in broader national databases.

For those with diagnosed food allergies, carrying emergency medication is essential. Epinephrine auto-injectors should be kept accessible at all times, not just at home but also when traveling or dining out. It is equally important to educate your family and close friends about your allergies and how to recognize the early signs of an allergic reaction, such as hives, swelling, or difficulty breathing. Clear communication with restaurant staff and hosts about your dietary needs can prevent accidental exposure in social settings. Remember that while manufacturers strive for accuracy, human error is inevitable; therefore, personal vigilance remains your strongest tool for staying safe.

  • Always read the full ingredient list and allergen statement on every package, even if you have bought the product before.
  • Sign up for FDA recall alerts to receive timely notifications about food safety issues.
  • Carry prescribed emergency medication, such as epinephrine, if you have known severe allergies.
  • Educate your household and close friends on how to respond in case of an allergic reaction.

How to tell if you have this one

Check for the UPC 8 10158 14087 5 on the packaging. The product is a pumpkin spice no-bake cookie with a net weight of 3.5 oz.

  • Brand
    Best Friends Bakery
  • Product
    PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE NET WT 3.5 oz. INGREDIENTS: WHOLE GRAIN OATS, MILK, MARGARINE***WATER, SALT, CONTAINS LESS
  • Category
    Food
Based on the official FDA remedy

What to do — step by step

  1. Check for Allergens

    Look for the UPC 8 10158 14087 5 on the packaging to identify the recalled product.

✎ GovInfoNow

Questions people ask

Why is this product being recalled?

The product lists peanuts and eggs in the ingredient statement but omits them from the 'contains' statement, which could cause allergic reactions for people with peanut or egg allergies.

What should I do if I have the recalled product?

Check for the UPC 8 10158 14087 5 on the packaging. If you have the product, you may want to contact Best Friends Bakery for more information.

Is there a remedy for this recall?

The recall record does not specify a remedy.

Take action

Contact Best Friends Bakery

We’ve drafted a message you can send Best Friends Bakery to request your refund or repair — edit it as you like.

Subject: Recall H-1386-2026 — Best Friends Bakery PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE NET WT 3.5 oz. INGREDIENTS: WHOLE GRAIN OATS, MILK

Hello,

I own a PUMPKIN SPICE NO BAKE COOKIE NET WT 3.5 oz. INGREDIENTS: WHOLE GRAIN OATS, MILK, MARGARINE***WATER, SALT, CONTAINS LESS that is covered by recall H-1386-2026 from Best Friends Bakery.

I’m writing to arrange the remedy described in the recall (a refund, repair, or replacement as applicable). Could you please tell me the next steps to resolve this?

Thank you.

Similar recalls

Keep exploring

From people who’ve dealt with this

Experiences, tips, and questions from readers. Every comment is reviewed before it appears.

No comments yet — be the first to share your experience.

Comments are reviewed before they appear. No links, ads, or personal attacks — those get removed.

Where this comes from

The facts (hazard, remedy, dates, manufacturer) are pulled from the official FDA recall record. The plain-language summary and step-by-step checklist are written by GovInfoNow to make the official notice easier to act on — they don’t replace it.

  • Official source: FDA Recall #H-1386-2026 (August 17, 2026)
  • Plain-language summary written by qwen3:4b on October 4, 2026, from the official record above. Not reviewed by a person — if it conflicts with the FDA notice, the notice is correct. Report an error on this page.
  • GovInfoNow is an independent service and is not a government agency. We republish official FDA recall data; we don’t issue, amend or administer recalls.
GovInfoNow is an independent guide. We are not FDA or any government agency. Always confirm details with the official recall.Data: CPSC · FDA · NHTSA · USDA